The suburbs are often lined up for derision. They have too many roads, too many cars, the houses are too big, they suburbs wasteful, they are ostentatious and so forth. But suburbs are popular, and develop strong and tight communities. One school of thought seems to be that the suburbs will end up wastelands as energy prices increase to the point where they are unsustainable, an opposing viewpoint is that the suburbs can become the focal point of intellectual, food, energy and commercial production.

Commerce

In his novel Distress Greg Egan writes of a post-information age Sydney where the CBD is a wasteland. His main characters live in the suburb of Epping and actually travel into the CBD to see the new tourist areas that the government has paid for to try and bring the suburbanites back into the city centre to spend their money.

In Egan's post-information age world, telecommuting and an entrepreneurial-contractor commercial landscape turned the CBD into a ghostland. Without commerce to support it, the CBD had no reason to exist and the suburbs took over as the dominant place of economic, social and cultural activity.

Telecommuting is on the rise as bandwidth becomes ubiquitous. It is predicted 3.4 million Australians will telecommute by 2008. Other than Sydney and Melbourne, telecommuters, as a group, are larger in number than most Australian cities.

That has the potential to be transformative.

Food

Suburban land is some of the best agricultural land in Australia. This is a result of the way that modern cities have grown from agrarian origins. Bill Mollison developed the technology of Permaculture which is a suburban technology as much as an agricultural one. This takes advantage of natural patterns in plant partnering, location and watering to maximise the output of a square metre of land.

The method of food production is successful enough that small blocks of land, such as the old suburban quarter acre, can provide up to 80% of a household's food needs. This isn't for everyone, however, most suburban yards are purely decorative but even a little addition of food production can take pressure of the family budget.

Permaculture mixes in food bearing plants with decorative plants to radically change the whole notion of the front and back yard.

Even with houses getting larger and blocks smaller, as is the pattern in recent developments in western Sydney, there is still ample room on a building block to lay decorative garden beds that can produce food. Another aspect of permaculture is that it is permanent agriculture, there is no seeding each year, the system is set up so nature does that itself.

So it is self-sustaining. Once a permaculture garden is started, it is off and running.

Energy

The North-east blackout in New York showed the vulnerability of heavily centralised energy systems. The suburban environment is prefect for decentralised energy system like solar power. Houses carry ample surface area and can feed their surplus energy production back into local or national energy grids.

A decentralised energy system would also protect against catastrophic failures in central systems such as the New York blackout, or something more common such as trees pulling down power lines.

Telecommunications companies have set up small generator networks that can load balance in times of stress. These are a decentralised response to possible failure of the major energy grid. Suburbs can do this as well, and if excess energy production is possible, make it commercially productive for the home-owners.

Conclusion

The suburbs are often denigrated, but they are thriving social and cultural areas, with strong community ties. Their reasonably large land plots means technologies such as permaculture and renewable energy have advantages in a suburban environment. The changing nature of telecommunications and work patterns to an entrepreneurial self-employed style of commerce also strengthen rather than weaken the suburbs.

It is possible that the suburbs will become the place of dominant production output.
Cam Riley: South Sea Republic. Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic.

Comments

  • The missing element in your analysis: The cost of labor.

    Most suburbs in the US (and I\'m assuming Australia) are dependent on inexpensive labor to tend the yards, do the housework, etc. Without a nearby city with less expensive, higher density housing, most suburbs would not work. I would think that if trends such as widespread suburban permaculture took off, this would be exacerbated as it takes far more labor to tend and harvest crops than it does to tend a lawn.

    Not that I think this is an insurmountable problem. I\'m only bringing it up because it seems like something that ought to be addressed.

    I also think you ought to be a bit more clear about the community aspect of suburbs. I don\'t think that there is any evidence that community varies according to the urban/suburban/exurban/rural distinction as community is largely a function of the desire of the people in a neighborhood to be social. As long as people desire community, communities will obtain. If you know of any objections to the ability of suburbs to grow communities, present them and explain why they do not pan out.

    Lastly, I think it interesting that your description of the suburb as the future sounds remarkably like a plantation. This is not a criticism, merely a curiosity.
  • cam . # .
    It has been a while since I read Permaculture: the whole way through, but rather than what wikipedia suggests, the book was 98% devoted to agricultural methods. It was also aimed toward small farms for increasing production. Small farms can include suburban plots too. It was intended to be sustainable, basically chug along as a productive garden on its own and with minimum input of effort (both labor and material).

    I don\'t think Mollison is intending that suburban plots outsource labor in the same way our high maintenance lawns and decorative gardens require.

    Also, suburban plots are intended to be a supplement to more centralised and specialised forms of agricultural production. IIRC one of the arguments was that the average household spends 33% of their weekly budget on food. Having a productive suburban plot can take a lot of that pressure off.

    I have also seen businesses that package and value-add herbs. Memory is dim, but I think it was from the south coast. Basically people grew herbs in their garden, which is a low maintenance crop, and trimmed it twice a year, selling it to the company that value added. A form of decentralised agriculture, but not a co-operative.

    I am not arguing the suburbs create any better sense of community, other than to say they have strong communities. The stereotype is often that the suburbs are soulless, disconnected and cause inter-personal isolation. I do not agree with that.

    It would also be interesting to see if social production (like opensource) is an urban or suburban phenomenon, or if there is no predisposition to location.

    cam
  • adam . # .
    Inexpensive labour: Do you mean paying people (who live in the city) to mow the lawn, clean the house etc, or something more abstract? Because the former is quite rare in Australia. I\'d assumed it was pretty rare in the US too, outside TVs and movies selling a particular upper middle class lifestyle.