GG as rights defender:
If 6.1 is being broken by action, rather than legislation, than by definition it is the executive doing the breaking, no? Whoever it is doing the detention, ultimately they are under the authority of an executive, whether at the state or federal level. So if the police/military/whomever are doing it at the command of the executive (premier+cabinet or PM+cabinet) then the "executive act" language of 1.3 should cover it.
My rights are inviolable. No legislative or executive act - by Federal, State or local government - may remove my rights. I have the right to apply to the Govenor General for review of any law that contravenes my rights. If I am being prosecuted, detained or otherwise subject to Government action due to a law that contravenes my right, review must be immediate.
If they are doing it at their own behest then we\'re having a coup and all of the above is just words on paper until the coup is put down.
And if the PM+Cabinet (or a Premier with the tolerance of the Federal government) are ignoring the GG, or the judiciary, when they override unconstitutional action/legislation then all bets are off, mandate is dissolved, and rebellion is in play, AFAIAC.
Comments