The Lowy Institute recently released a study entitled; "Diaspora. A World Wide Web of Australians" [PDF] . A shorter op-ed on the report in the SMH was entitled; "Forget the brain drain, a new global community of Australians is emerging" . Fullilove and Flutter argue that since so many Australians in the Diaspora occupy positions of power overseas ("the gold collar workers"), it increases Australia's soft power by keeping them involved with Australia. They offer six recommendations for this.

The Australian Diaspora remains engaged in Australian life, that is true for me. And I do not plan a Germaine Greer or Robert Hughes style exile, that is a Diaspora of the past. I plan to return to Australia, much wiser in the world for my travels. I, as a current member of the Diaspora, offer recommendations to the Australian government as to what they can do to keep me involved as part of the Australian political process. The verdict is - the government has a lot of catching up to do. The Diaspora is a country mile ahead of them.

The Australian Diaspora

The Diaspora is no longer the back-packers of years past or the self-imposed cultural exiles. With globalisation, the nature of the Australian Diaspora has also changed, now including more and more professionals. These numbers have doubled in the last fifteen years which has prompted concerns of an Australian brain drain. This has an easy answer however, make Australian salaries competitive, and increase oppurtunities - many Australians will choose to work in Australia, wanderlust aside.

Fullilove and Flutter sum up the size and changing nature of the Diaspora in the opening;

... there are approximately one million Australians outside Australia, perhaps three-quarters of whom live offshore on a permanent or long term basis. This latter group, the "Australian diaspora", is large and, in the main, prosperous, well educated, well connected, and well disposed to this country. It is also very mobile: rather than turning their backs on Australia once and for all, expatriates these days are more likely to move back and forward between Australia and other countries as opportunities present.

Fullilove and Fuller back this up with plenty of data. One of the more interesting graphs is Figure 2.3 which shows a comparison of the percentage of people leaving vs resident population;

  • Manager/Administrators : 11% leaving, 9% resident
  • Professionals : 26% leaving, 19% resident
  • Associate Professionals : 6% leaving, 14% resident
  • Trade Persons : 4% leaving, 13% resident
  • Clerical/Sales/Services : 9% leaving, 14% resident
  • Labourers : 1% leaving, 9% resident

The modern Diaspora is heavily made up of professionals. Professor Hugo found that it was likely that 42% of Diaspora Australians held degrees, in comparison to the 9% of the Australian population. This is the changing nature of the Diaspora in the last fifteen years, and a direct result of low salaries and oppurtunities in Australia for that group of the labour market.

Opportunity and Nation States In The Way

The nature of individual opportunism will treat the restrictions that nation-states place on the labour market as an annoyance. Skilled individuals will seek new horizons, and opportunities overseas. However, it is important to differentiate between opportunities and culture. One aspect that Fullilove and Flutter identify is that the Diaspora still feels Australian. Professor Hugo was quoted as saying ;

These people overseas are culturally part of Australia. There may be ways they could be incorporated more into Australian activities. ..... Australia is more than geography. Australia is its people.

This is true, I have lived twenty-six years in Australia and seven in America. I speak like an Australian and remain culturally an Australian. I think it is cultural naivety and immaturity that leads many Australians to think that being Australian requires living in Australia. Culture is an ephemeral aspect, and doesn't follow arbitrary borders of nation-states. That is culture's power and wonder.

When I go back to Australia I feel more comfortable there, I don't suffer any cultural shocks which I still do in the US. People even speak like me, and the little social and cultural mores that get taken for granted, can be wonderfully comforting. By the same token, I am not going to deny myself a great adventure or new opportunities just to remain cloaked in a cultural comfort zone.

I suspect for many Australians, their discovery of Australian culture only came when they left Australia's shores. Once you get outside of the country, and even in anglosphere countries like the USA and UK, it is pretty bloody obvious that Australia has a strong and unique culture. I got a greater respect for Australian culture when I went through six months of culture shock in the New York region. It was wonderful - a life expanding experience.

Their Recommendations

Fullilove and Chloe have several recommendations for the Australian Government and Australian private industry. The main thrust of their recommendations is to point out that there is a large, well educated and influential Diaspora that wants to be included - and that government and industry have largely forgotten, dismissed or ignored them.

1. The Australian government should lead from the top by embracing the Australian Diaspora rhetorically. It should sharpen its interaction with expatriates through reforms to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, including the establishment of a coordinating unit within the Department.

2. All sectors should energise their networking with the Diaspora, particularly those sectors in which Australia can gain from better international collaboration and information exchange.

3. Institutions should strengthen expatriate linkages through short term return fellowships.

4. Non-profit organisations should pursue the fundraising opportunity offered by the Diaspora, including combined efforts to achieve benefits of scale.

5 Government should reform overseas voting procedures to better accommodate expatriates, and establish a joint parliamentary standing committee on the Diaspora.

6 Government agencies should collect more and better quality data on the Diaspora.

These recommendations have a strong government focus. The overseas voting procedures are harsh, which I ran up against recently. No Australian should be dropped off the electoral roll; unless they choose to. Also the Diaspora has no-one in parliament representing their issues exclusively, having a minister for the Diaspora would be of benefit. Especially in areas such as getting our spouses work visas and the like with ease. Making it easy for us to move back and forth between countries. Many of us have families that are international, so this would be of massive benefit.

As to the Government reaching out rhetorically to the Diaspora, well they can bugger off. Get an independent foreign policy and defence force first and I may take the government seriously internationally. Also dump that retarded Union Jack on the Australian flag as well as the Queen of England. It makes us look like a poodle nation. Basically, how about the government acts with the humble confidence and independence on the world stage that the Diaspora does first, before they reach out to us "rhetorically". They will be judged by our standard, not us by theirs.

Not sure what the non-profits reaching out to the Diaspora as a source of revenue does or means. Why do I care? Why would I give my greenbacks to an Australian non-profit. Maybe they mean think-tanks, not charities? Not certain about that recommendation. We aren't a money pit. Smacks too much of the Diaspora being an untapped resource to bleed dry, rather than involve the Diaspora into Australian life.

My Recommendations

Or how to have the Diaspora take the Australian Government seriously. The Diaspora is handling itself on the world stage with confidence, independence and wonderful aplomb. We are everywhere, in larger numbers than ever before, and in all sorts of positions of responsibility. We are doing so without any cultural cringe or social shirk - we are firm believers that our solutions are superior and that our ability to provide those solutions are superior. So what would be the first recommendation to the Australian Government?

  • Act with the same confidence and independence on the world stage the Australian Diaspora does.

The Australian Government is woefully behind the Diaspora here. It acts uncritically to the US, maintains the heraldry of the UK despite the majority of the people not wanting it. The cultural cringe has been kicked by Australians in the early 1990's when cultural maturity gathered at an exponential rate.

Unfortunately the Australian Government still maintains a political cringe. It is behind the people in maturity and growth. Before I am interested in the government's overtures to the Diaspora, I want proof that they have dropped the political cringe and act with the same confidence that the Diaspora does on the world stage.

The Political Franchise

Next recommendation;

  • Don't disenfranchise us.

Don't dump us off the rolls after three years, ensure that we are franchised as Australians always, even if it is not compulsory for us to vote. Some in the Diaspora might think that it is not fair for them to vote when they are not in Australia, others might feel disenfranchised by being in an electorate that was their last place of residence, others just might not be able to vote this time round.

Either way, given the temporary nature of the Diaspora despite being away long term, give us every opportunity to remain enfranchised and part of the political process and discourse.

Does 5% Deserve An Electorate?

On the subject of enfranchisement, why should I vote in an electorate in Australia? Should 1 million people that are Australian have their own electorate, and consequently their own representative in Parliament? If the government is truly to understand and represent our interests in foreign policy, defence policy and immigration policy - wouldn't they be better served by giving us an electorate and a direct representative in parliament? Abso-bloody-lutely IMO.

Hence Number 3;

  • Ensure we have an electorate that is external to Australia, and a representative in Parliament.

Maybe have an electorate for The Americas, UK, Europe, Asia and Africa. The US, UK and Greece are the top three Diaspora locations, but there will come a day when China rivals them. So five electorates across each continent would be useful in gauging the distinct needs of the Diaspora. This would give representatives in parliament that directly represent the needs of the Diaspora.

Which leads to Number 4;

  • Have a Minister for the Diaspora.

Dump the minister for sport, or some other meaningless department and give their staff and budget to the Diaspora. With a minister representing our needs we may be able get change done so that work visas are simpler to get, so our spouses and families can move in and out of the country with the same ease we can. Whether our spouses and families are tourists, temporary residents and permanent residents.

I think this is a very necessary innovation. Those of us who plan to bring their spouses back to the country, believe it is utterly inane for them to not be allowed to work for any length of time. One of my friends had his wife not allowed to work for eighteen months. Many of us in the Diaspora have spouses that are very well educated with amazing experience in some of the economic hotbeds on the planet. Not allowing them to instantly become economic actors in Australia is criminal.

Return The Pride

We are more than the stereotype of Steve Irwin. The Diaspora are an independent folk, obviously not scared to chart the international waters of adventure. But our government is failing us at home; by not showing the same independence and confidence in our institutions and heraldry as we see in ourselves. I live in the US, the remarkable republic that was the triumph of the enlightenment. Coming from a Constitutional Monarchy is anti-enlightenment. Note to Australian Government, catch up to the Diaspora, you are lagging behind.

  • Australia must be a Republic.

A constitutional monarchy is so 16thC, we skipped the enlightenment courtesy of the incompetence of the "bearded men" in the 1890's. There is no need to propagate or prolong that failure. A republic is currently he best form of representative government that a free people can consent to. So do it. No more political cringe. Become as independent as we are. A republic is just one necessary step on that path.

Symbols of Independence

We fly all manner of flags of the front of our house here in the US. Historical flags, both Australian and American. The most popular of the flags we fly in the neighbourhood is the boxing kangaroo flag. It encapsulates the image of the Australian fighting spirit wonderfully, with absolutely no ambiguity as to what the image is, and what it means.

The Blue Ensign though? My wife had an argument in Washington DC when a vendor tried to sell her a New Zealand flag claiming it was the Australian one. The vendor is not alone, Quebec decked the streets with New Zealand flags when greeting Robert Hawke. The Australian Monarchist League has also had problems discerning between the two . So next recommendation;

  • Get the Union Jack off the Australian flag.

The Australian flag does not represent me as an Australian. It makes us look like a poodle nation to the UK. Dump it. Give us a symbol that shows how unique and independent Australia is.

Conclusion

Fullilove and Flutter's report identifies that the Diaspora is changing with "gold collar" workers leaving the country. The Diaspora has been changing anyway from the backpacker rite of passage of the past. This is part globalism, and part Australian thirst for adventure, opportunities and wealth. Stagnant salaries and opportunities in Australia have probably only helped to increase the rate of emigration in the last fifteen years.

The report offers several recommendations, but doesn't take in the Australian Diaspora's point of view much. One of the point's cynically recommending that the Diaspora be a new source of money for non-profits. The Australian Diaspora is not like the Salvadorean Diaspora. The big problem government is going to have is that is behind the Australian people and the Diaspora in its development. Government is still far too infantile in how it views Australia on the international stage.

The Diaspora walks the international stage with aplomb, confidence and independence. The government has a lot of catching up to do, otherwise its aiming rhetoric at the Diaspora will fall on cynical deaf ears in the Diaspora.

cam
More reading: Tags
Cam Riley: South Sea Republic. Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic.

Comments

  • The Diaspora is not static: This is not from the report you quoted but from one done by the CEDA in \'02, from memory. Study is at work.

    It quoted a figure of 60-100,000 long term expats returning to Australia per year. So in one term there is fair amount of turn over of the expat population.

    The problem with gaining political voice for expats is that while away they are not on the sitting members minds because they are not in their electorate.
    Then when the expats return, they are back in the political porcess and loose the drive to lobby for expat enfranchisement.

    The only solution I see is to some how \'rev up\' the returning expats to lobby on arrival back in the country. Hard to do...
  • WIPO: diaspora electorate & dump the union Jack
  • cam . # .
    High churn rate: Probably the biggest issue for returning expats is if they have foreign spouses and children. Getting their spouses work visas and permanent residency is an issue. I know I am not looking forward to having to deal with immigration. But I doubt that is enough to make returned expats politically active.

    Possibly in the future an ex-diaspora member will be in the executive cabinet and make some changes, but politicians tend to be careerists climbing the rungs of the political parties from a young age. So that might not happen for 50 years yet.

    cam
  • cam . # .
    multi-choice code: I need to incorporate hulver\'s multi-choice scoop code.

    cam
  • cam . # .
    btw diaspora has a political lobby group: as well. The Southern Cross Group .

    cam
  • Well: Hawkie went to uni in the UK.  Didn\'t John Howard spend some time working there?  He might not think of that as overseas though ...