Some thoughts on Geoff Gallop's recent decision to spend $1.75 million to
get kids into the Royal Show for free, plus thoughts on election advertising.
Gallop's Royal Show vote-buyer
Western Australian Premier Geoff Gallop announced this week that children
under 15 will get into this year's Perth Royal Show for free, funded by
taxpayers. This is supposedly to celebrate the state's 175th anniversary
and the Royal Show's 100th. I don't think there are many people around who
think this is a good use of $1.75 million while the health and education
systems are desparate for more cash.
Gallop attacked over Show handout
Gallop shouts under-16s day at show The money is being paid directly to the show organisers, the Royal Agricultural Society. Yet despite being taxpayer funded, kiddies will need a coupon from the Sunday Times to get in for free. I'm sure Murdoch will appreciate the extra sales. I won't be going to the Royal Show this year to protest. I'm a man of principle! Since my tax dollars have been redirected to Royal Show admissions, I refuse to pay a further $15 to get in. That will show them. Election advertising Political advertising is now in full swing. Two of my favourites feature the Labor Party promoting themselves as a champion of state issues. The first has Kim Beazley talking about how much he cares about Western Australia and how important state issues are to him and Mark Latham. The other has Latham reiterating the same thing, plus talking about how his wife is from Perth. It was actually strangely reminiscent of our new managing director at work. Latham talked further about introducing a coast guard service to protect our vast coastline and ensuring the WA gets its fair share of federal government money. I would be curious to know how the major parties are directing their advertising to regional issues in other parts of Australia. Are they promising everyone a fair share? The Libs were the first to get personal this time around. I think the ads are reasonable though. There are a couple of ads on TV that focus on Latham's time in local government, and how poor he was at managing their budget. If Mark Latham can't manage a local council, how can he manage Australia's economy? Labor's counter-attack was directed at Howard's handling of the children overboard affair. They highlight some of Howard's excuses about not knowing what was going on. If Howard isn't aware, that's terrible. If he is, that's worse. Mainstream Australia seems to have forgotten the whole thing, so I don't think this ad will have much impact. Another Labor advertisement is an "election scratchy", with Howard's face being scratched off to reveal Costello underneath. It's a bit of a scare about who will be in charge. The funniest part is Tony Abbott trying to explain the situation: You may have one year of Howard and two years of Costello, or one year of Costello and one year of Howard and two years of Costello . There have even been a couple of ads that focus on actual issues, but they're far less interesting. One has Howard promising to be strong in protecting Australia, including the new air warfare destroyers. Another has Labor promising to reduce/abolish full fee places at universities, and encouraging doctors to bulk bill. But as I said, they're not particularly interesting and I haven't taken much notice. Meta-comment Cam, is there any way to get diaries linked from the front page? It took me ages to realise that they're not there anymore. And when I did I had a bit of catching up to do.
Gallop shouts under-16s day at show The money is being paid directly to the show organisers, the Royal Agricultural Society. Yet despite being taxpayer funded, kiddies will need a coupon from the Sunday Times to get in for free. I'm sure Murdoch will appreciate the extra sales. I won't be going to the Royal Show this year to protest. I'm a man of principle! Since my tax dollars have been redirected to Royal Show admissions, I refuse to pay a further $15 to get in. That will show them. Election advertising Political advertising is now in full swing. Two of my favourites feature the Labor Party promoting themselves as a champion of state issues. The first has Kim Beazley talking about how much he cares about Western Australia and how important state issues are to him and Mark Latham. The other has Latham reiterating the same thing, plus talking about how his wife is from Perth. It was actually strangely reminiscent of our new managing director at work. Latham talked further about introducing a coast guard service to protect our vast coastline and ensuring the WA gets its fair share of federal government money. I would be curious to know how the major parties are directing their advertising to regional issues in other parts of Australia. Are they promising everyone a fair share? The Libs were the first to get personal this time around. I think the ads are reasonable though. There are a couple of ads on TV that focus on Latham's time in local government, and how poor he was at managing their budget. If Mark Latham can't manage a local council, how can he manage Australia's economy? Labor's counter-attack was directed at Howard's handling of the children overboard affair. They highlight some of Howard's excuses about not knowing what was going on. If Howard isn't aware, that's terrible. If he is, that's worse. Mainstream Australia seems to have forgotten the whole thing, so I don't think this ad will have much impact. Another Labor advertisement is an "election scratchy", with Howard's face being scratched off to reveal Costello underneath. It's a bit of a scare about who will be in charge. The funniest part is Tony Abbott trying to explain the situation: You may have one year of Howard and two years of Costello, or one year of Costello and one year of Howard and two years of Costello . There have even been a couple of ads that focus on actual issues, but they're far less interesting. One has Howard promising to be strong in protecting Australia, including the new air warfare destroyers. Another has Labor promising to reduce/abolish full fee places at universities, and encouraging doctors to bulk bill. But as I said, they're not particularly interesting and I haven't taken much notice. Meta-comment Cam, is there any way to get diaries linked from the front page? It took me ages to realise that they're not there anymore. And when I did I had a bit of catching up to do.








Comments
I have no idea what\'s going on with the time. A bit of brief experimentation:
It seems all wrong. I think scoop needs to know what timezone it\'s in - are scoop and the server itself set consistently?
From the times above, it seems that the WAST timezone is incorrect. It should be two hours behind EAST and eight ahead of GMT, instead it\'s -3 and +7 respectively. K5 used to have a problem with WAST being out by an hour, so maybe it\'s a scoop thing. I complained a few times but nobody was listening.