The suburbs contain a lot of land and space which is not being put to productive use other than as a living space. I expect as aspects of our modern life decentralise, such as energy, then we will see suburban communities go from sustainable solutions to productive ones.

It will probably not be too dissimilar to how I have adsense on this website. It doesn't make me a living salary, but it does cover the cost of the site. If solar cells could pay the property taxes and so on, then it would be more than useful for most people. (more)

I am not sure why suburbia cops so much in the way of hostility. I grew up in Sydney's north western suburbs, and other than a stint in Coogee/Maroubra, the rest of my time in Australia and the United States has been in suburban environments. Even now I am living in suburbia. I like it.

Normally the stereotypes of suburbia are thrown up, such as the row upon row of aesthetically similar houses, townhomes and condos. Like in the picture above which is a new suburb in Nth Virginia. What isn't seen in that picture is that those townhomes back onto a town-squarish type of mall.
The other arguments against suburbia are that it is boring, looks too similar, lacks culture, people are fleeing back to the urban environments because of gas prices, houses use too much gas/electricity, roads and petrol consumption, etc. While urban environments achieve green economies of scale the impact from suburbs is not that great. Most of our fossil fuel emissions are from stationary energy sources, not road transportation. Same with water consumption, agriculture is the biggest user of fresh water, not residential (urban or surburban).
There has been an exit from suburbia recently - as in the last two decades - as young people seek more cultural lives in the town squares of cities and the increasing cost of suburban housing followed by the foreclosures - have placed pressure on the suburbs. Historically there has been an ebb and flow from the urban and suburban centers. This is nothing really new. The urban-scapes will most likely one day become unpalatable for a multitude of reasons and the suburbs will grow again.
The other issue is that as technologies decentralise, whether it be transport of the 1950s, telecommunications of the 80s and 90s, or maybe solar technology of the future. The large land areas of the suburbs will most likely come to the fore as productive areas again. A roof is a large solar collector for instance, more than a condominium balcony can offer.

The suburbs are often lined up for derision. They have too many roads, too many cars, the houses are too big, they suburbs wasteful, they are ostentatious and so forth. But suburbs are popular, and develop strong and tight communities. One school of thought seems to be that the suburbs will end up wastelands as energy prices increase to the point where they are unsustainable, an opposing viewpoint is that the suburbs can become the focal point of intellectual, food, energy and commercial production.
(more)
Lee Malatesta : The missing element in your analysis: The cost of labor.
Most suburbs in the US (and I\'m assuming Australia) are dependent on inexpensive labor to tend the yards, do the housework, etc. Without a nearby city with less expensive, higher density housing, most suburbs would not work. I would think that if trends such as widespread suburban permaculture took off, this would be exacerbated as it takes far more labor to tend and harvest crops than it does to tend a lawn.
Not that I think this is an insurmountable problem. I\'m only bringing it up because it seems like something that ought to be addressed.
I also think you ought to be a bit more clear about the community aspect of suburbs. I don\'t think that there is any evidence that community varies according to the urban/suburban/exurban/rural distinction as community is largely a function of the desire of the people in a neighborhood to be social. As long as people desire community, communities will obtain. If you know of any objections to the ability of suburbs to grow communities, present them and explain why they do not pan out.
Lastly, I think it interesting that your description of the suburb as the future sounds remarkably like a plantation. This is not a criticism, merely a curiosity.
cam : It has been a while since I read Permaculture: the whole way through, but rather than what wikipedia suggests, the book was 98% devoted to agricultural methods. It was also aimed toward small farms for increasing production. Small farms can include suburban plots too. It was intended to be sustainable, basically chug along as a productive garden on its own and with minimum input of effort (both labor and material).
I don\'t think Mollison is intending that suburban plots outsource labor in the same way our high maintenance lawns and decorative gardens require.
Also, suburban plots are intended to be a supplement to more centralised and specialised forms of agricultural production. IIRC one of the arguments was that the average household spends 33% of their weekly budget on food. Having a productive suburban plot can take a lot of that pressure off.
I have also seen businesses that package and value-add herbs. Memory is dim, but I think it was from the south coast. Basically people grew herbs in their garden, which is a low maintenance crop, and trimmed it twice a year, selling it to the company that value added. A form of decentralised agriculture, but not a co-operative.
I am not arguing the suburbs create any better sense of community, other than to say they have strong communities. The stereotype is often that the suburbs are soulless, disconnected and cause inter-personal isolation. I do not agree with that.
It would also be interesting to see if social production (like opensource) is an urban or suburban phenomenon, or if there is no predisposition to location.
cam
adam : Inexpensive labour: Do you mean paying people (who live in the city) to mow the lawn, clean the house etc, or something more abstract? Because the former is quite rare in Australia. I\'d assumed it was pretty rare in the US too, outside TVs and movies selling a particular upper middle class lifestyle.








